link to Expropriation Law Centre home page

Cases



Menu

Advertisement

Peterson Stark Scott

Advertisement


Free Case Law
[Back] DECISION DIGEST  
Record no. 294
Case name: Whitechapel Estates Ltd. v. British Columbia (Minister of Transportation and Highways)
Date: 1999-03-02
Jurisdiction: Canada - British Columbia
Court: Supreme Court
Release registry: [Subscribers only]
Court file: [Subscribers only]
Order no.: [Subscribers only]
Parties: Name   Appearing as
  Delsom Estates Ltd.   Claimant
  Elsom, Norman Dennis   Claimant
  Piccadilly Estates Ltd.   Claimant
  Whitechapel Estates Ltd.   Claimant
  British Columbia (Minister of Transportation and Highways)   Authority
  Delta (Municipality)   Authority
  Eames, Lesley   Other
  Guthrie, Art   Other
  St. Clair, Fiona M.   Other
Before: Decision maker Designation
Macdonald, Bruce Dawson J.
Lawyers: Name   Appearing for
  Goodwin, David H.   Claimant
  Sharma, Neena   Authority
  Woodward, Michael C.   Authority
  Finlay, John L.   Other
Experts:  
Taking type: [Subscribers only]
Valuation date: [Subscribers only]
Case elements: [Subscribers only]
Decision: Application by the Claimants for an order prohibiting three members of the Expropriation Compensation Board from having any further involvement with a compensation claim filed by the Claimant under the Expropriation Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 125 on grounds of bias. The application also sought an order for directions as to the composition of the panel which will hear the compensation claim and an order for special costs. The court dismissed the application and granted costs to the Authority and the other parties.

The court also considered applications to have the action dismissed as against the District of Delta and for an order requiring two witnesses to attend for cross-examination on their affidavits. The application to dismiss the action against Delta was granted and the application to cross-examine on affidavits was dismissed.
Comment: [Subscribers only]
Statute references: [Subscribers only]
Case references: [Subscribers only]
Related decisions:      
  Earlier
  [1993] EXLAW 48 B.C. E.C.B. 1993-06-16
  [1993] EXLAW 301 B.C. C.A. 1993-11-15
  [1994] EXLAW 109 B.C. S.C. 1994-08-24
  [1994] EXLAW 79 B.C. E.C.B. 1994-12-05
  [1994] EXLAW 80 B.C. E.C.B. 1994-12-06
  [1995] EXLAW 34 B.C. C.A. 1995-02-09
  [1996] EXLAW 160 B.C. E.C.B. 1996-02-27
  [1996] EXLAW 167 B.C. E.C.B. 1996-05-10
  [1998] EXLAW 253 B.C. E.C.B. 1998-01-14
  [1998] EXLAW 272 B.C. C.A. 1998-08-18
  Later
  [2002] EXLAW 313 B.C. E.C.B. 2002-06-04
  [2002] EXLAW 323 B.C. C.A. 2002-10-04
  [2003] EXLAW 305 B.C. C.A. 2003-01-27
Neutral citation: N/A
ExLaw citation: [1999] EXLAW 294
Parallel citations: [1999] B.C.J. No. 481
  (1999) 66 L.C.R. 193
Reasons: [Subscribers only]
Digests contain original content produced by ExLaw and copyright in this content is held by Dicta Legal Services Ltd. (dba Expropriation Law Centre). Reasons for decision are the text of original decisions released by the court or tribunal and edited for accuracy where required. No copyright is claimed for these materials.
Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:

Email:


Subscribe 
Unsubscribe 

Online Subscription
Service
Online Subscription Service sign-up
Online Subscription Service log-in

Advertisement


© 2024 Dicta Legal Services Ltd.
Page last updated: April 21, 2024