link to Expropriation Law Centre home page

Cases



Menu

Advertisement

Peterson Stark Scott

Advertisement


Free Case Law
[Back] DECISION DIGEST  
Record no. 186
Case name: Greatbanks v. British Columbia (Minister of Transportation and Highways)
Date: 1996-09-06
Jurisdiction: Canada - British Columbia
Court: Expropriation Compensation Board
Release registry: [Subscribers only]
Court file: [Subscribers only]
Order no.: [Subscribers only]
Parties: Name   Appearing as
  Greatbanks, James   Claimant
  TNL Construction Ltd.   Claimant
  British Columbia (Minister of Transportation and Highways)   Respondent
Before: Decision maker Designation
Shorthouse, Robert W.C. Chair
Lawyers: Name   Appearing for
  Burke, Reinhard   Claimant
  Macdonald, Sarah I.   Respondent
Experts:  
Taking type: [Subscribers only]
Valuation date: [Subscribers only]
Case elements: [Subscribers only]
Decision: Application by the Claimants to the British Columbia Expropriation Compensation Board for several procedural rulings in relation to a claim for compensation made pursuant to the Expropriation Act, S.B.C. 1987, c. 23. The Board granted an order requiring delivery of further particulars, an order fixing a date for a compensation hearing and an order compelling the Respondent to produce a further list of documents. The Board dismissed an application to strike out the Respondent's Reply and an application to compel the Respondent to provide an affidavit verifying its list of documents.
Comment: [Subscribers only]
Statute references: [Subscribers only]
Case references: [Subscribers only]
Related decisions:      
  Earlier
  [1996] EXLAW 177 B.C. E.C.B. 1996-06-21
  Later
  [1997] EXLAW 254 B.C. S.C. 1997-12-31
  [1998] EXLAW 270 B.C. E.C.B. 1998-08-07
  [2003] EXLAW 328 B.C. E.C.B. 2003-12-03
Neutral citation: N/A
ExLaw citation: [1996] EXLAW 186
Parallel citations: (1996) 59 L.C.R. 185
Reasons: [Subscribers only]
Digests contain original content produced by ExLaw and copyright in this content is held by Dicta Legal Services Ltd. (dba Expropriation Law Centre). Reasons for decision are the text of original decisions released by the court or tribunal and edited for accuracy where required. No copyright is claimed for these materials.
Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:

Email:


Subscribe 
Unsubscribe 

Online Subscription
Service
Online Subscription Service sign-up
Online Subscription Service log-in

Advertisement


© 2024 Dicta Legal Services Ltd.
Page last updated: April 21, 2024