Expropriation Law Centre

Cases


Menu

Advertisement

Peterson Stark Scott

Advertisement


Free Case Law
[Back] DECISION DIGEST  
Record no. 389
Case name: Superior Gravel Co. Ltd. v. British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority
Date: 1977-05-06
Jurisdiction: Canada - British Columbia
Court: Supreme Court
Release registry: [Subscribers only]
Court file: [Subscribers only]
Order no.: [Subscribers only]
Parties: Name   Appearing as
  Superior Gravel Co. Ltd.   Appellant
  British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority   Respondent
Before: Decision maker Designation
Ferry, William Dow Co. Ct. J.
Lawyers: Name   Appearing for
  Hope, Henry A.   Appellant
  McEwen, John M.   Respondent
Experts: Name Occupation Appearing for
  Barnes, C.H. Appraiser Appellant
  Joslin, Edward G. Appraiser Respondent
  Godfrey, Claude Herbert Appraiser Other
Taking type: [Subscribers only]
Valuation date: [Subscribers only]
Case elements: [Subscribers only]
Decision: Appeal by a property owner and cross appeal by the expropriating authority from the findings of a valuator appointed pursuant to the British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority Act, S.B.C. 1964, c. 7. The valuator had been appointed to fix the amount of compensation to be paid by the expropriating authority for the expropriation of a right of way 11.45 ac. in size from a parcel having an area of 418.5 ac. The subject property was located near the City of Prince George. The right of way was expropriated for an electric transmission line. The valuator had fixed compensation in the amount of $12,248. The owner sought compensation in the amount of $110,627 and the authority proposed payment of $2,000. On appeal the court found that the land had a value of $1,800 per acre and allowed 80% of the land value as compensation. The award totalled $16,488 plus interest. Each party was ordered to pay its own costs.
Comment: [Subscribers only]
Statute references: [Subscribers only]
Case references: [Subscribers only]
Related decisions:      
  Earlier
 
  Later
 
Neutral citation: N/A
ExLaw citation: [1977] EXLAW 300
Parallel citations:  
Reasons: [Subscribers only]
Digests contain original content produced by ExLaw and copyright in this content is held by Dicta Legal Services Ltd. (dba Expropriation Law Centre). Reasons for decision are the text of original decisions released by the court or tribunal and edited for accuracy where required. No copyright is claimed for these materials.
Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:

Email:

Subscribe 
Unsubscribe 
Online Subscription
Service
Online Subscription Service sign-up
Online Subscription Service log-in

Advertisement


© 2024 Dicta Legal Services Ltd.
Page last updated: October 14, 2023