Expropriation Law Centre

Cases


Menu

Advertisement

Vandema Commercial Real Estate Resources

Advertisement


Free Case Law
[Back] DECISION DIGEST  
Record no. 271
Case name: Hampton Investments Ltd. v. British Columbia (Minister of Transportation and Highways)
Date: 1998-08-07
Jurisdiction: Canada - British Columbia
Court: Expropriation Compensation Board
Release registry: [Subscribers only]
Court file: [Subscribers only]
Order no.: [Subscribers only]
Parties: Name   Appearing as
  Hampton Investments Ltd.   Claimant
  British Columbia (Minister of Transportation and Highways)   Authority
Before: Decision maker Designation
St. Clair, Fiona M. Vice-Chair
Lawyers: Name   Appearing for
  Wilson, Cora D.   Claimant
  Hincks, Alan V.W.   Authority
Experts: Name Occupation Appearing for
  Chatwin, Brian Engineer Claimant
  Gibson, David Engineer Claimant
  Jones, J. Russell Forester Claimant
  McKenzie, Philip Property Negotiator Claimant
  McNab, Murray Engineering Technologist Claimant
  Pritchard, Keith T. Appraiser Claimant
  Richardson, Ronald W. Appraiser Claimant
  Rogers, Kenneth N. Appraiser Claimant
  Simpson, Carmi Engineering Technologist Claimant
  Aberdeen, David Property Negotiator Authority
  Gordon, Alasdair K. Appraiser Authority
Taking type: [Subscribers only]
Valuation date: [Subscribers only]
Case elements: [Subscribers only]
Decision: Application by the Claimant for a final cost review pursuant to the Expropriation Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 125, s. 45. The Claimant submitted claims for legal, appraisal, engineering and land consulting costs totalling $141,542.16. Prior to the hearing the Authority had advanced $36,061.89 towards the costs claimed. The Board awarded $73,235.82. Claims for interest on the cost award were dismissed.
Comment: [Subscribers only]
Statute references: [Subscribers only]
Case references: [Subscribers only]
Related decisions:      
  Earlier
  [1997] EXLAW 230 B.C. E.C.B. 1997-06-11
  Later
 
Neutral citation: N/A
ExLaw citation: [1998] EXLAW 271
Parallel citations: (1998) 64 L.C.R. 284
Reasons: [Subscribers only]
Digests contain original content produced by ExLaw and copyright in this content is held by Dicta Legal Services Ltd. (dba Expropriation Law Centre). Reasons for decision are the text of original decisions released by the court or tribunal and edited for accuracy where required. No copyright is claimed for these materials.
Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:

Email:

Subscribe 
Unsubscribe 
Online Subscription
Service
Online Subscription Service sign-up
Online Subscription Service log-in

Advertisement


© 2024 Dicta Legal Services Ltd.
Page last updated: October 14, 2023